CONTAGION IN QUESTION: Myth or Reality?

Questions and Answers about “Contagion” from another biological perspective ❓

Question 1

If, according to Germanic Medicine, the theory of contagion does not exist, how is it that if we do not have certain bacteria, we can acquire them from someone who does❓ Wouldn’t that be contagion❓ And wouldn’t the same happen with viruses❓

Answer:
🔹 With bacteria:
The human body has its own microbiome, but at times it may lack a specific strain needed to repair a certain tissue. In such cases, contact with another person can act as a “source” of those bacteria. This is not interpreted as pathological contagion, but rather as a functional and symbiotic transfer. In nature, this exchange occurs constantly—through air, water, food, or simple coexistence. A common example is when a dog licks its owner’s face: millions of microorganisms come into contact with the body, and if needed, they integrate into a framework of biological cooperation.

🔹 With viruses:
According to Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer, “viruses” have never been isolated or proven to exist as autonomous infectious agents. What is observed are fragments of genetic material and proteins produced by our own cells. Therefore, what conventional medicine interprets as a “viral infection” actually corresponds to a repair phase of an organ controlled by the cerebral cortex.

🔹 Bacterial cooperation according to Hamer:
Hamer maintained that bacteria serve the organism. If the body needs help repairing a tissue, it can benefit from bacteria that live within another’s microbiota. This is not contagion in the sense of disease, but rather symbiotic cooperation. In everyday life, we coexist with countless microorganisms without becoming ill, because they are not enemies but allies, depending on the biological program we are experiencing.

👉 In summary: this is not contagion as an external threat, but a natural exchange of information and microorganisms within a symbiotic framework. With bacteria, this is evident and functional; with viruses, from this perspective, it does not apply because they do not exist as living entities that can be transmitted from person to person.

Question 2

If in a group of children from one community, some travel to another country and return with bacteria from that unfamiliar environment, could it happen that the other children, who did not travel, almost all trigger at the same time a program involving those bacteria❓

Answer:
This could happen as long as those children are in normotonia (outside of an SBS) or in the active phase, and the information from those “foreign” bacteria is useful or necessary to them. In that case, those bacteria may be received and used upon entering the PCL phase (post-conflictolysis), generating a stronger repair than usual.

From this arises an interesting conclusion: our body is not naturally designed for rapid travel by airplane or modern vehicles, because these do not allow sufficient time for biological adaptation to the new environment. On the other hand, moving gradually (as when walking) does allow proper homeostasis. Abrupt environmental changes can provoke an imbalance that triggers an SBS (Special Biological Program) with dangerous intensity for the person.

🌱 Reflection on suitable environments for human beings

Being in a suitable environment does not only mean sharing space with our relatives, friends, or close people. It also implies remaining close to our invisible allies: the friendly bacteria that are part of our internal and external balance. When a human being is “out of place,” they are not only distanced from emotional and cultural bonds, but also from the microbiota that accompanies them and with which their body has developed a cooperative relationship.

Traveling or abruptly changing environments exposes us to unfamiliar people and unfamiliar bacteria, creating an adaptive demand that can be intense or even dangerous for the organism. This is why stable human groups are not an accident: they respond to a profound biological sense, where customs, behaviors, and even bacteria are shared, ensuring collective adaptation and greater homeostasis.

Living in a parabiological system, disconnected from the Biological Laws, makes us ignore the biological cost of our decisions. Every forced move, every uprooting, and every abrupt environmental change demands a price in terms of bodily adaptation. Understanding these laws means recognizing that our well-being depends on natural rhythms, on symbiosis with our environment, and on awareness of the place to which we truly belong.