Dr. Hamer to the Nobel Committee

Dr. med. Mag. theol. Ryke Geerd Hamer
Sandkollveien 11
N – 3239 Sandefjord
October 18, 2008

To the Nobel Committee
Stockholm

Subject:
Awarding of the prize for the discovery of a (non-existent) AIDS virus to Luc Montagnier and Françoise Barré-Sinoussi,
and for the discovery of a (non-existent) virus in cervical ulcers.

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen of the Prize Jury,

Do you truly realize what you have decided?

I can hardly believe it, because you have awarded a Nobel Prize for “the Emperor’s new clothes” — something that does not even exist.

In the Meyers Lexikon of 1908, under virus, it says: “(Latin) poison, specific disease poison.”
That was all that was known back then. Nothing has changed since — no one has ever seen a virus or its replication.

The hypothesis that unseen viruses cause “disease” is false, because — according to the scientifically verified Germanic New Medicine (GNM) — they could, at most, play a role in healing.

Strictly speaking, we should therefore say:
“Hypothetical viruses in the pcl-phase = healing phase — and if they exist, they would be exclusively reconstructive or restitutive workers, acting on ectodermal tissue, helping to rebuild ulcers of the skin and mucous membranes, refilling the cellular substance lost in ectodermal-cortex-controlled organs, accompanied by swelling.”

Consequently, no one has ever seen an AIDS virus, let alone proven its existence as would be required to claim that a virus exists.

To imagine a virus as a disease-causing agent active during the conflict-active phase in the ectoderm (skin) or mesoderm (lymph nodes, bones) makes no sense — such a process does not exist in Germanic New Medicine.
And if it appeared during the pcl-phase (healing phase), it would not cause illness. In reality, it appears in neither phase — it simply does not exist.

No one has ever observed a consistent symptom pattern following so-called HIV infection, as we see in measles or rubella.
HIV viruses themselves are never found in AIDS patients.
Since there is no distinct “AIDS symptomatology,” medical diagnosis has become a matter of arbitrary interpretation.

That is why, already in the first edition of my book Legacy of a New Medicine, I wrote — and was the very first to do so — that AIDS is the greatest fraud of our century.

What, then, is the HIV reaction?

I have now collected between 50 and 100 cases demonstrating that HIV is merely a reaction — what we call in GNM a “track” (Schiene).

When a patient suffers a DHS (conflict shock) related to male smegma — for example, a man catches his wife or partner in flagrante with another man, and is deeply affected by the smell of his smegma — he develops a smegma track.

Each time he relives the conflict or perceives that smell again, his HIV titer rises.

That is one half of the secret of HIV.

The other half is that circumcised men do not produce smegma, and as long as they associate exclusively among themselves, they cannot become HIV positive.
This fact, says Hamer, can of course also be used as a “religious weapon” against the uncircumcised.

The same applies to the supposed cervical ulcer virus (HPV).
No one has ever been able to prove its existence.
To claim that these non-existent viruses appear precisely in the healing phase (pcl-phase) of cervical ulcers is utter nonsense, according to the natural-scientific findings of Germanic New Medicine.

Therefore, this award is — there is no other way to put it — an act of complicity and favoritism with the pharmaceutical industry and certain religious circles, or more plainly: a great fraud.

Even worse: since this fraud has cost countless human lives, it must also be regarded as “complicity in mass murder by a criminal organization.”
One can only turn away in horror from such a prize committee.

Moreover, Luc Montagnier himself declared in 1985 in Barcelona that he had never seen an AIDS virus.
And now, that man without character accepts the Nobel Prize for the ‘Emperor’s new clothes,’ fully aware of how vile this deception is.

Dr. med. Ryke Geerd Hamer